 |
Leica IIIc
One of my father's cameras. The Leica was fitted with an Elmar 50mm
lens (with non standard aperture settings) and came with some Bakelite
extension tubes and close up rings.
This camera was used from 1965 to 1972 and was only put aside when
it developed shutter problems at slower speeds.
The camera has one black and one red shutter which suggests it may
have been an ex Luftwaffe model. It is in very good condition -
it doesn't suffer the metal delamination of later Leica III's.
I
still have this camera.
|
 |
Ilford
Advocate
Only used briefly but an interesting camera with a distinctive white
enamel body. It was quite heavy. For some reason I thought this
camera was the Sportsman but the old grey cells are fooling me.
It was used around 1965 and I can't recall what happened to it.
|
 |
Praktica
L
We all start off our SLR career somewhere and the Praktica was a
simple, robust camera that lasted me from 1972 to 1984. Fitted with
a Tamron 135mm lens it supplemented and then replaced the Leica.
The telephoto did it really - essential for air shows.
Sold around 1984.
|
 |
Olympus
OM1n
The first serious system camera I bought. Motor drive, 28mm, 50mm
and 85-250mm zoom made it excellent for aviation work. Used solidly
from 1984 to 1989.
I sold the whole package just to buy one Hasselblad body and lens..
I really liked this camera and got some excellent shots with it.
I was sorry to let it go.
.
|
 |
Hasselblad 500C
Beautiful. With the 'Blad it is back to Weston meters, manual focus
and exposure but you really start to get a deeper understanding
of the basics with this camera. Initial adjustment to compose to
6 x 6 format was slow - it was months before I was taking decent
photos - but it grows on you.
This camera was 35 years old when I bought it and it is still going
strong. All Hasselblad parts are given a two letter code from which
you can work out the year they were made. The code is as below and
my CU stamped camera was made back in 1957:
VHPICTURES
1234567890
Default lens is an 80mm - equivalent to a 50mm lens on a 35mm camera.
|
 |
Hasselblad
250mm lens
My first essential for building up the 500C system. This was an
old 1408 (1971) lens but it is still a cracker.
The 250 was rapidly followed by a 40mm wide angle and a spare magazine.
|
 |
Hasselblad
ELM500
The ELM body is the 500C with built in motor drive. Excellent for
remote shots as it can be fired from a long cable or from a remote
control.
The 40mm Distagon lens shown is a heavy beast weighing around 5lb.
It is superb but you have to take care with that huge front element!
Later 40mm lens are not as large.
|
 |
Olympus
AF-1
With moving up to medium format I started to miss out on a lot of
"grab" shots - so I augmented the 'blad with this nice
little pocket camera. The AF-1 took superb shots until it developed
a cataract - the glue between the lens started to turn cloudy.
Sold in car boot sale.
|
 |
Nikon
FM2
Actually my better half's camera but I use it for air to ground
work. Basic system is the body and motor drive plus a 28-75mm zoom
and the 100-300 zoom. This makes a nice compact system useful for
a lot of work.
Still around but hardly used.
|
 |
Nikon 100 - 300mm Zoom
Brilliant lens. Some users don't like the sliding barrel zoom but
this lens has just the right amount of friction for good control.
You just have to remember not to pick the camera up by the sliding
zoom barrel!
|
 |
Olympus
Mju 1
Bought after the AF-1 packed in and just as good. It is half the
thickness and the first true pocket camera I owned - it went everywhere
with me.
Still around but digital has taken over.
|
 |
Olympus
Mju 2
The Mju 2 was smaller still than the Mju 1 and probably the smallest
possible design for the 35mm system. Another excellent camera.
Sits in a drawer with the Mju 1.
|
 |
Olympus
C900Z
My first digital camera and somewhat a revelation despite the 1.3
MP resolution. Along with the Mju's it became a permanent part of
my travelling kit. It went through 4 AA batteries like stink if
you used the rear LCD at all but was much better if you turned the
LCD off.
Sold
and replaced by the Mju 400.
|
 |
Olympus
Mju 400 Digital
My second venture into digital photography and the move that gave
serious thoughts to a fully digital future. Superb camera, excellent
photo's. 4MP resolution was very good indeed.
Died
suddenly in Jan 2006 with sensor failure. Not worth repairing.
|
 |
Olympus
C765 Digital
The first "semi serious" digital camera for me. Superb
lens offering 35mm to 350mm optical range. Again it was 4MP but
the added zoom made it a very worthwhile tool. Complemented the
Mju400 very well although it was just to big to fit in a jacket
pocket..
Like the Mju 400 this camera only lasted 2 years. In this case the
on/off circuit failed and the camera would continually activate
on and off until the battery was flat.
|
 |
Olympus
Mju 600 Digital
Bought to replace the dead Mju 400. Features a 6MP resolution and
a huge rear LCD screen. No viewfinder - which became more and more
annoying as time went by.
Eventually I found this camera too frustrating to use and despite
excellent results from it I gave it away. Although it was in my
pocket constantly it had substantially less use than the lovely
Mju400.
The
failures of the earlier Olympus digitals and the annoying Mju600
effectively ended my use of Olympus cameras.
|
 |
Canon
Ixus 55 Digital
Although
the Mju 600 above was a very good camera it suffered from one serious
deficiency - no viewfinder. This proved worse than expected, especially
in strong sunlight.
The
Canon Ixus 55 is only 5MP but it is smaller than the Mju 600. It
has a nice viewfinder - and an LCD screen as big as the Olympus.
An added advantage is that it uses SD memory cards which are interchangeable
with my iPAQ and the Nikons.
|
 |
Nikon D50 Digital
The
compact digital cameras proved so versatile to use they became the
first cameras to grab if just nipping to the shops or when going
on holiday. The bulky Hasselblad outfit was the first to suffer
but even the FM2 started to become sidelined. Digitals are far too
convenient and the idea of lugging serious film equipment around
became very unappealing..
In
getting the Nikon D50 I was intending to break away from the growing
reliance on the compacts, good though they were, and move back to
better optics of a mainstream camera. It was a good move. The D50
is a very capable camera and can give excellent results if fitted
with a good lens.
The
D50 and D80 are used with a series of lenses. In addition to the
80-400mm I also use the 18-55mm, an 18-135mm and a 70-200mm.
|
|
Nikon D80 Digital
The
D50 was intended to replace the Nikon FM2. It was rapidly complemented
with a Nikon D80 coupled with an AF VR 80-400mm zoom allowing far
greater ranges than I'd ever achieved with the FM2 or Hasselbald.
This
is a delightful camera.
Nikon
AF VR Zoom ED 80-400mm f4.5-5.6
Bought
as the prime lens for the D80. Some dislike it for it's slow AF
but it is no problem on manual focus. The VR is very good at eliminating
camera shake but don't expect it to correct target motion - that's
still up to the user.
The
shot below is hand held - click on the image for the full size photo.

|
 |
Canon
Ixus 82 Digital
The
Canon Ixus 55 has proved a very good camera so it was inevitable
that the evolving range would see the purchase of a later model
with higher resolution. The Ixus82 moves up to 8MP and gives superb
results.
|